CMAJ • June 5, 2007; 176 (12). doi:10.1503/cmaj.061556.
© 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Millett, C.
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Millett, C.
Right arrow Articles by Majeed, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Diabetes
Right arrowRelated Articles


Research

Impact of a pay-for-performance incentive on support for smoking cessation and on smoking prevalence among people with diabetes

Christopher Millett, Jeremy Gray, Sonia Saxena, Gopalakrishnan Netuveli and Azeem Majeed

From the Wandsworth Primary Care Research Centre, Wandsworth Primary Care Trust (Millett, Gray); and the Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine (Millett, Saxena, Netuveli, Majeed), London, England.

Correspondence to: Christopher Millett, Specialist Trainee in Public Health, Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, 3rd floor, Reynolds Building, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, St Dunstan's Road, London UK W6 8RP; fax 44 20 7594 0866; c.millett{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background: Many people with diabetes continue to smoke despite being at high risk of cardiovascular disease. We examined the impact of a pay-for-performance incentive in the United Kingdom introduced in 2004 as part of the new general practitioner contract to improve support for smoking cessation and to reduce the prevalence of smoking among people with chronic diseases such as diabetes.

Methods: We performed a population-based longitudinal study of the recorded delivery of cessation advice and the prevalence of smoking using electronic records of patients with diabetes obtained from participating general practices. The survey was carried out in an ethnically diverse part of southwest London before (June–October 2003) and after (November 2005–January 2006) the introduction of a pay-for-performance incentive.

Results: Significantly more patients with diabetes had their smoking status ever recorded in 2005 than in 2003 (98.8% v. 90.0%, p <0.001). The proportion of patients with documented smoking cessation advice also increased significantly over this period, from 48.0% to 83.5% (p < 0.001). The prevalence of smoking decreased significantly from 20.0% to 16.2% (p < 0.001). The reduction over the study period was lower among women (adjusted odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53–0.95) but was not significantly different in the most and least affluent groups. In 2005, smoking rates continued to differ significantly with age (10.6%–25.1%), sex (women, 11.5%; men, 20.6%) and ethnic background (4.9%–24.9%).

Interpretation: The introduction of a pay-for-performance incentive in the United Kingdom increased the provision of support for smoking cessation and was associated with a reduction in smoking prevalence among patients with diabetes in primary health care settings. Health care planners in other countries may wish to consider introducing similar incentive schemes for primary care physicians.



Related Articles

Highlights of this issue
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2007 176: 1685. [Full Text] [PDF]

Dans ce numéro
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2007 176: 1685. [Full Text] [PDF]

Pay for performance: learning about quality
Chaim M. Bell and Wendy Levinson
Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2007 176: 1717-1719. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
E. Koshy and C. Millett
The 'Quality and Outcomes Framework': improving care, but are all patients benefiting?
J R Soc Med, September 1, 2008; 101(9): 432 - 433.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. P. Wodchis, J. S. Ross, and A. S. Detsky
Is P4P Really FFS?
JAMA, October 17, 2007; 298(15): 1797 - 1799.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
C. M. Bell and W. Levinson
Pay for performance: learning about quality
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 5, 2007; 176(12): 1717 - 1719.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Should mechanics be paid extra for checking my brakes?
Maya A Kaczorowski
CMAJ, 7 Jun 2007 [Full text]